- From: Boley, Harold <Harold.Boley@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca>
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:11:14 -0500
- To: "Stella Mitchell" <cleo@us.ibm.com>, "RIF WG" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2008 19:12:21 UTC
Stella, I would say yes: The resolutions on Core are implemented; only a few issues are open (to become editors' notes in FPWD). We recently noticed that several examples in the current BLD spec are actually Core examples. So, we might generalize them for the BLD spec and keep them for the Core spec. We cannot be sure about a few BLD/Core feature adjustments that could be needed later, but dialect labeling in UCR would be helpful at this time. When the Core spec seems unclear for the purpose of such labeling, could you draw our attention to it? Harold ________________________________ From: public-rif-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rif-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Stella Mitchell Sent: November 11, 2008 2:50 PM To: RIF WG Subject: [RIF] test case dialect indicators Is Core settled enough that it makes sense to now go through the test cases and indicate which are Core? Currently all approved and proposed tests are marked as BLD. Stella
Received on Tuesday, 11 November 2008 19:12:21 UTC