- From: Adrian Paschke <adrian.paschke@biotec.tu-dresden.de>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:06:27 +0100
- To: "'Boley, Harold'" <Harold.Boley@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca>, "'Chris Welty'" <cawelty@gmail.com>, <gary.hallmark@oracle.com>
- Cc: "'Public-Rif-Wg \(E-mail\)'" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Thanks Chris, Harold, Adrian G., I totally agree with Chris, UCR should be no longer about defining critical success factors and design requirements. And as we discussed, the motivating examples which we selected for UCR are a good starting point. I'm working on the updates, incorporating also Garry's review comments. Cheers, Adrian P. -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: public-rif-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rif-wg-request@w3.org] Im Auftrag von Boley, Harold Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. März 2008 15:12 An: Adrian Giurca; Adrian Paschke; Chris Welty Cc: Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail) Betreff: RE: UCR document Thanks, Adrian Giurca! Hi Adrian Paschke and all, As I mentioned in this Tuesday's telecon, motivating examples could draw on (updated versions of) the UC "Worked Examples": http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/D._Evaluation%3A_Use_Cases Cheers, Harold -----Original Message----- From: public-rif-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rif-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Giurca Sent: March 27, 2008 9:14 AM To: Chris Welty Cc: Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail) Subject: Re: UCR document Hi all, I did a basic demo of interchange with RIF http://oxygen.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/rewerse-i1/?q=node/64 We will do some others in the near future too. Some time ago we implemented the Product Derby Use Case by using R2ML ( http://oxygen.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/userv/ ). I believe that trying to represent this use case with RIF it might be useful -Adrian Giurca Chris Welty wrote: > > > Adrian & RIFWG, > > At the last telecon we discussed Gary's UCR review, and I agreed to > share my thoughts on where the document should go. Up until now, the > UCR document has provided us a set of requirements, as well as some > "design constraints" that have guided our design of BLD. Going > forward, the UCR document will serve as a publicity vehicle for RIF. > It's purpose is not to guide us anymore, but to guide others to RIF, > to explain as simply as possible what RIF dialects are for and why > anyone should consider using them. It should not be a tutorial, > focusing on the "Why use RIF"? questions and not "How to use RIF", but > it should do this with clear motivating examples (i.e. Use Cases) > expressed in the syntax&semantics we have developed. > > -Chris >
Received on Thursday, 27 March 2008 18:07:21 UTC