- From: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
- Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:02:25 +0100
- To: Stella Mitchell <cleo@us.ibm.com>
- CC: public-rif-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <47D51541.2010108@inf.unibz.it>
Stella, Thanks a lot for the comments. Find replies to selected comments in line. I incorporated (or will do so very soon) all the other ones, save those related to the details of the BLD semantics; I will update those when BLD is frozen. > 1st definition: > The symbol D used in 2 different ways here? (as the datatype > map and as > the domain of the RIF interpretation.) They are distinguished by the domain being bold and italicized, whereas the datatype map is not. I believe that this is sufficient to distinguish the two. In principle, it would have been better to use two different symbols; however, in the original definitions the symbol D was used for both, and I wanted to keep as close as possible to the original definitions. > 5.4 > ---- > 1st para: > The embeddings of RDF and RDFS entailment --> > The embeddings of RDF and RDFS graphs ? those are embeddings of the respective entailment regimes, and not the graphs per se. best, Jos -- debruijn@inf.unibz.it Jos de Bruijn, http://www.debruijn.net/ ---------------------------------------------- One man that has a mind and knows it can always beat ten men who haven't and don't. -- George Bernard Shaw
Received on Monday, 10 March 2008 11:02:48 UTC