- From: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
- Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:02:25 +0100
- To: Stella Mitchell <cleo@us.ibm.com>
- CC: public-rif-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <47D51541.2010108@inf.unibz.it>
Stella,
Thanks a lot for the comments. Find replies to selected comments in
line. I incorporated (or will do so very soon) all the other ones, save
those related to the details of the BLD semantics; I will update those
when BLD is frozen.
> 1st definition:
> The symbol D used in 2 different ways here? (as the datatype
> map and as
> the domain of the RIF interpretation.)
They are distinguished by the domain being bold and italicized, whereas
the datatype map is not.
I believe that this is sufficient to distinguish the two. In principle,
it would have been better to use two different symbols; however, in the
original definitions the symbol D was used for both, and I wanted to
keep as close as possible to the original definitions.
> 5.4
> ----
> 1st para:
> The embeddings of RDF and RDFS entailment -->
> The embeddings of RDF and RDFS graphs ?
those are embeddings of the respective entailment regimes, and not the
graphs per se.
best, Jos
--
debruijn@inf.unibz.it
Jos de Bruijn, http://www.debruijn.net/
----------------------------------------------
One man that has a mind and knows it can
always beat ten men who haven't and don't.
-- George Bernard Shaw
Received on Monday, 10 March 2008 11:02:48 UTC