W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > June 2008

Re: BLD: externally defined frames

From: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:02:16 -0400
To: Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com>
Cc: "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20080627170216.7598452c@kiferdesk>

The purpose of using external frames is exactly the same as that of using
external predicates. It is just a different interface. It can be provided for
external objects, while external predicates is an interface for the regular
(non-object-oriented) builtin calls.

I would like to better understand what you and Christian had in mind. From the
F2F I understood that csma had right understanding of the purpose of that
feature. If the added wording is not what he expected then maybe it can be
improved (once I understand what is confusing there).


On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:05:10 -0400
Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com> wrote:

> Christian and I read the new text explaining external frames in BLD 
> [http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/BLD#Terms] and although we each had a 
> different understanding of what external frames were, it matched neither, which 
> is problematic.
> Given the time constraints I think the only choice is to leave that text as is 
> but label it at-risk for last call & open an issue.  Then we can discuss it 
> further during the summer.  We hope to propose and resolve that quickly - I 
> specifically don't want to get dragged into a lengthy discussion of what 
> external frames are, just a quick decision to label at risk so we can publish, 
> and we'll have the lengthy discussion later.
> -Chris
Received on Friday, 27 June 2008 21:02:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:07:45 UTC