- From: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:02:16 -0400
- To: Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
The purpose of using external frames is exactly the same as that of using external predicates. It is just a different interface. It can be provided for external objects, while external predicates is an interface for the regular (non-object-oriented) builtin calls. I would like to better understand what you and Christian had in mind. From the F2F I understood that csma had right understanding of the purpose of that feature. If the added wording is not what he expected then maybe it can be improved (once I understand what is confusing there). --michael On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:05:10 -0400 Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Christian and I read the new text explaining external frames in BLD > [http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/BLD#Terms] and although we each had a > different understanding of what external frames were, it matched neither, which > is problematic. > > Given the time constraints I think the only choice is to leave that text as is > but label it at-risk for last call & open an issue. Then we can discuss it > further during the summer. We hope to propose and resolve that quickly - I > specifically don't want to get dragged into a lengthy discussion of what > external frames are, just a quick decision to label at risk so we can publish, > and we'll have the lengthy discussion later. > > -Chris >
Received on Friday, 27 June 2008 21:02:52 UTC