- From: Adrian Paschke <adrian.paschke@biotec.tu-dresden.de>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:00:32 +0200
- To: "'Christian de Sainte Marie'" <csma@ilog.fr>, <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
- Cc: "'Paul Vincent'" <pvincent@tibco.com>, "'RIF WG'" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Typical examples are business rules, such as If customer is premium customer then discount 10% If customer is silver customer then discount 5% It would make sense to present them independent from a particular dialect such as PRD or BLD as they can be formalized in both dialects. Adrian -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: public-rif-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rif-wg-request@w3.org] Im Auftrag von Christian de Sainte Marie Gesendet: Montag, 23. Juni 2008 21:49 An: kifer@cs.sunysb.edu Cc: Paul Vincent; RIF WG Betreff: Re: [PRD] ACTION-531 Update PRD examples complete Michael Kifer wrote: > > Your own words. You have been suggesting various changes to quantification and > such arguing that this is more compatible with your ideas about production > rules. For instance, > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2007Jun/0026.html, > but also on a number of occasions during f2fs. Indeed, I have always been, and still am, a strong supporter of BLD and PRD sharing the same meta-model and concrete XML syntax everywhere it made sense. That does not imply that they must share their concrete presentation syntax as well, does it? > it has smthg to do with the credibility of the "target audience" claim. ...or with Gary not considering the "target audience" argument useful. Christian
Received on Monday, 23 June 2008 21:01:18 UTC