- From: Adrian Paschke <adrian.paschke@biotec.tu-dresden.de>
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:48:47 +0200
- To: "'RIF WG'" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
I updated all examples in UCR so that they use ":-" to describe rules in a dialect independent representation syntax. If we find a better sign or way to describe rules in an independent format, I will change it again. Currently, ":-" seems to be a good solution as it is part of a well-known ISO standard. The main idea is that the rule examples are presented in a neutral presentation syntax which can be mapped into the concrete presentation syntax of a dialect (e.g. BLD or PRD) or directly serialized in the concrete XML syntax of a dialect. I keep noting that RIF should be a general interchange format, i.e. interchange between different rule engines should be possible, too, e.g. between a production rule engine and a derivation rule engine. For typical business rules and policies this is often feasible. -Adrian -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: public-rif-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rif-wg-request@w3.org] Im Auftrag von Adrian Paschke Gesendet: Samstag, 14. Juni 2008 13:41 An: 'RIF WG' Betreff: Update UCR requirements completed I completed Action-523 "Update UCR to reflect resolutions in today's meeting" and updated all requirements according to our resolutions. - Adrian
Received on Thursday, 19 June 2008 08:49:29 UTC