Re: new drafts

I went through this in bld and made sure that all text inside ul/ol is also
inside the li-tags.
Can u check if this fixes the html in the output version?

michael

On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:28:13 -0400
Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:

> 
> > The numbering seems ok in the wiki.
> 
> That depends on your browser.  Since the page is invalid (not
> well-formed) HTML, its meaning/rendering is not defined by the specs.
> Different software handles the situation differently.
> 
> The W3C publication rules require that all publications be valid HTML,
> so my toolchain runs "tidy" [1] which tries to repair any invalid HTML.
> In this case, its repair algorithm does not do what we'd like.  But, of
> course, the solution is to fix the wiki page.
> 
> In this case, it looks to me like there is content inside lists
> (<ol>...</ol>) which is not inside list-items tags (<li>...</li>).
> That should never be the case.
> 
>      -- Sandro
> 
> 
> [1] http://tidy.sourceforge.net/
> 
> > Maybe it is a problem with the html conversion tool?
> > 
> > michael
> > 
> > On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:15:04 -0400
> > Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > There's a new set of snapshots of all six documents, slated for
> > > publication next week, linked from the WG homepage.
> > > 
> > > (BLD still has some invalid HTML, of which one symptom is the broken
> > > numbering in section 6.1.)
> > > 
> > >     -- Sandro
> > > 
> > > 
>

Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2008 19:00:23 UTC