Thursday, 31 July 2008
- Re: [F2F] Prefered location for F2F11
- Re: [F2F] Prefered location for F2F11
- Re: [F2F] Prefered location for F2F11
Wednesday, 30 July 2008
- Re: [F2F] Prefered location for F2F11
- new drafts
- Re: [PRD] Default conflict resolution strategy (ISSUE-64) (Was; Re: [Fwd: Re: PRD Review])
- fixed namespace error in BLD
- [F2F] Prefered location for F2F11
- Re: [PRD] Default conflict resolution strategy (ISSUE-64) (Was; Re: [Fwd: Re: PRD Review])
- Re: BLD: externally defined frames
- Re: [PRD] Default conflict resolution strategy (ISSUE-64) (Was; Re: [Fwd: Re: PRD Review])
- Re: [PRD] Default conflict resolution strategy (ISSUE-64) (Was; Re: [Fwd: Re: PRD Review])
Tuesday, 29 July 2008
- Re: [PRD] Default conflict resolution strategy (ISSUE-64) (Was; Re: [Fwd: Re: PRD Review])
- Re: [PRD] Default conflict resolution strategy (ISSUE-64) (Was; Re: [Fwd: Re: PRD Review])
- [Admin] draft minutes for 29 July 2008 RIF telecon
- Re: [PRD] Default conflict resolution strategy (ISSUE-64) (Was; Re: [Fwd: Re: PRD Review])
- Re: BLD: externally defined frames
- Re: BLD: externally defined frames
- Re: DTB semantics for PRD
- Re: [PRD] Default conflict resolution strategy (ISSUE-64) (Was; Re: [Fwd: Re: PRD Review])
- Re: [PRD] Default conflict resolution strategy (ISSUE-64) (Was; Re: [Fwd: Re: PRD Review])
- Re: DTB semantics for PRD
- DTB semantics for PRD
- [PRD] Default conflict resolution strategy (ISSUE-64) (Was; Re: [Fwd: Re: PRD Review])
- Re: [SWC] ACTION-492: review changes in SWC
- Re: [SWC] ACTION6492: review changes in SWC
- Re: [SWC] ACTION-492: review changes in SWC
- [SWC] ACTION6492: review changes in SWC
- Re: checklinks
- Re: new drafts
Monday, 28 July 2008
- Re: checklinks
- Re: checklinks
- Re: checklinks
- Re: checklinks
- Re: checklinks
- checklinks
- Re: new drafts
- Re: BLD: externally defined frames
- [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon July 29
- Re: BLD: externally defined frames
- AW: UCR snaphsot
- Re: new javascript for syntax selection
Sunday, 27 July 2008
Saturday, 26 July 2008
Friday, 25 July 2008
Wednesday, 23 July 2008
- Re: new drafts
- Re: new drafts
- Re: new drafts
- new drafts
- Re: new javascript for syntax selection
- Re: new javascript for syntax selection
- Re: new javascript for syntax selection
- Re: new javascript for syntax selection
- new javascript for syntax selection
Tuesday, 22 July 2008
- [Admin] draft minutes of 22 July 2008 telecon
- checklinks
- urgent for all editors: ,validate and ,checklinks
Monday, 21 July 2008
- [DTB] Discussion on rf:text vs. owl:internationalizedString vs. ???
- RE: FLD review
- [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon July 22
- Re: FLD review
- RE: [RIF] BLD comments
Sunday, 20 July 2008
Friday, 18 July 2008
Thursday, 17 July 2008
Wednesday, 16 July 2008
Tuesday, 15 July 2008
- Re: Draft minutes for telecon: 15 July 2008
- Re: Draft minutes for telecon: 15 July 2008
- RE: Frozen versions? [was: Re: [RIF] DTB comments]
- ISSUE-69 (Core schema): Should there be a Core schema incldued in BLD and PRD schemata? [Technical Design (multiple dialects/documents)]
- Draft minutes for telecon: 15 July 2008
- Re: Regrets (again)
- Regrets (again)
- [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon July 15
Monday, 14 July 2008
- Re: BLD issue: non-disjointness of internal and external predicate symbols
- Re: BLD issue: non-disjointness of internal and external predicate symbols
- Re: Frozen versions? [was: Re: [RIF] DTB comments]
- Re: Frozen versions? [was: Re: [RIF] DTB comments]
Sunday, 13 July 2008
Saturday, 12 July 2008
- Re: [RIF] DTB comments
- Re: [RIF] DTB comments
- AW: [RIF] generated frozen versions of documents
- AW: review of RIF UCR (ACTION-539)
Friday, 11 July 2008
- Re: [RIF] DTB comments
- review of RIF UCR (ACTION-539)
- Re: BLD: two issues with the BNF
- Re: [RIF] DTB comments
- Re: BLD: two issues with the BNF
- Re: BLD: two issues with the BNF
- RE: BLD: two issues with the BNF
- Re: BLD: two issues with the BNF
- Re: BLD: two issues with the BNF
- Re: BLD: two issues with the BNF
- Re: BLD: two issues with the BNF
- Re: [RIF] DTB comments
- Re: [RIF] DTB comments
- Frozen versions? [was: Re: [RIF] DTB comments]
- Re: [RIF] DTB comments
- Re: [RIF] generated frozen versions of documents
- Re: [RIF] DTB comments
- [RIF] generated frozen versions of documents
- [RIF] DTB comments
- Re: [DTB] Extractor function for the datatype? (was: [Fwd: Re: I18N issues an OWL2])
- Re: BLD: two issues with the BNF
- Re: small problem with SWC
- Re: BLD: two issues with the BNF
- small problem with SWC
- Re: [DTB] Extractor function for the datatype? (was: [Fwd: Re: I18N issues an OWL2])
Thursday, 10 July 2008
- Re: [DTB] Extractor function for the datatype? (was: [Fwd: Re: I18N issues an OWL2])
- Re: [DTB] Extractor function for the datatype? (was: [Fwd: Re: I18N issues an OWL2])
- Re: BLD: two issues with the BNF
- Re: BLD: two issues with the BNF
- Re: BLD: two issues with the BNF
- Re: BLD: two issues with the BNF
- Re: BLD: two issues with the BNF
- Review of BLD, frozen draft 7 July 2008
- Re: BLD issue: non-disjointness of internal and external predicate symbols
- Re: BLD issue: non-disjointness of internal and external predicate symbols
- Re: BLD issue: non-disjointness of internal and external predicate symbols
- Re: BLD issue: non-disjointness of internal and external predicate symbols
- Re: BLD issue: non-disjointness of internal and external predicate symbols
- [BLD] 'Const' Grammar in BLD
- BLD: two issues with the BNF
- Re: Editorial issues around DTB (and also for BLD, SWC and FLD)
- Re: SWC review part 4 (final part) - (Re: RDF and owl compatibility document ready to be frozen)
- Re: Editorial issues around DTB (and also for BLD, SWC and FLD)
- Re: Editorial issues around DTB (and also for BLD, SWC and FLD)
- BLD issue: non-disjointness of internal and external predicate symbols
- Re: Editorial issues around DTB (and also for BLD, SWC and FLD)
- [DTB] Extractor function for the datatype? (was: [Fwd: Re: I18N issues an OWL2])
- Editorial issues around DTB (and also for BLD, SWC and FLD)
- Re: SWC review part 4 (final part) - (Re: RDF and owl compatibility document ready to be frozen)
Wednesday, 9 July 2008
- SWC review part 4 (final part) - (Re: RDF and owl compatibility document ready to be frozen)
- Re: RDF and owl compatibility document ready to be frozen
- [Admin] updated minutes from RIF telecon 8 July 2008
- Re: [SWC] comments/review SWC - part3
Tuesday, 8 July 2008
- [Admin] draft minutes from RIF telecon 8 July 2008
- [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon 8 July
- Re: Agenda for Telecon 8 July 2008
- wiki fixed
- Re: Agenda for Telecon 8 July 2008
- Re: [SWC] comments/review SWC - replies to Jos' replies on part 1 of the review.
- European Master in Computational Logic - scholarships for European students - last deadline
- Agenda for Telecon 8 July 2008
Monday, 7 July 2008
- Re: the role of FLD in extensions (was Re: one thing we forgot)
- frozen drafts of PRD and BLD...
- RE: the role of FLD in extensions (was Re: one thing we forgot)
- Re: the role of FLD in extensions (was Re: one thing we forgot)
Sunday, 6 July 2008
- Re: the role of FLD in extensions (was Re: one thing we forgot)
- the role of FLD in extensions (was Re: one thing we forgot)
- Re: one thing we forgot
- Re: one thing we forgot
Saturday, 5 July 2008
- Re: one thing we forgot
- Re: one thing we forgot
- Re: one thing we forgot
- Re: one thing we forgot
- Re: one thing we forgot
- RE: media type (mime type) registration (ACTION-536)
- RE: one thing we forgot
- Re: at risk features
- Re: media type (mime type) registration (ACTION-536)
- Re: RE: media type (mime type) registration (ACTION-536)
- Re: one thing we forgot
- one thing we forgot
Friday, 4 July 2008
- RE: media type (mime type) registration (ACTION-536)
- media type (mime type) registration (ACTION-536)
- Re: at risk features
- Re: [PRD] is in a freezable state
- [FLD/BLD/PRD] PS for variables
- Re: at risk features
- Re: [PRD] is in a freezable state
Thursday, 3 July 2008
- Re: [PRD] is in a freezable state
- Re: at risk features
- Re: at risk features
- Re: at risk features
- final PRD snapshot ready
- file upload broken on rif wiki?
- Re: at risk features
- [FLD/BLD/PRD] NAU: slot content ordered?
- RE: [RIF BLD] metadata and XML syntax
Wednesday, 2 July 2008
- at risk features
- Re: [BLD] NAU as external function?
- [BLD] NAU as external function?
- Re: [Fwd: Re: PRD Review]
- Re: [Fwd: Re: PRD Review]
- frozen UCR and DTB
- Re: [PRD] Further proposals to help move PRD towards FPWD
- Re: [RIF] Minutes from today's teleconf.
Tuesday, 1 July 2008
- [RIF] Minutes from today's teleconf.
- Re: [PRD] Further proposals to help move PRD towards FPWD
- ISSUE-68 (NAU in PRD): Named argument UNITERM in PRD? [PRD ]
- Re: [PRD] Further proposals to help move PRD towards FPWD
- Re: [PRD] Further proposals to help move PRD towards FPWD
- Re: [PRD] Issues to resolve before publication (NAU)
- Re: [Fwd: Re: PRD Review]
- Re: [PRD] Issues to resolve before publication (Assign/Modify)
- Re: [PRD] Issues to resolve before publication (ATOMIC as RULE)
- Re: BLD: externally defined frames
- Re: [PRD] Issues to resolve before publication (NAU)
- Re: BLD: externally defined frames
- Re: RIF Core, and how much is PRD allowed to diverge from BLD [Was: Re: [PRD] Issues to resolve before publication]
- Re: [PRD] Issues to resolve before publication (NAU)
- Re: [PRD] Issues to resolve before publication (NAU)
- Re: RIF Core, and how much is PRD allowed to diverge from BLD [Was: Re: [PRD] Issues to resolve before publication]
- Re: RIF Core, and how much is PRD allowed to diverge from BLD [Was: Re: [PRD] Issues to resolve before publication]
- Re: [PRD] Issues to resolve before publication (NAU)
- Re: [PRD] Issues to resolve before publication (NAU)
- Re: [PRD] Issues to resolve before publication (et proposed resolutions)
- Re: RIF Core, and how much is PRD allowed to diverge from BLD [Was: Re: [PRD] Issues to resolve before publication]
- Re: [PRD] Issues to resolve before publication (NAU)
- Re: [SWC] comments/review SWC - replies to Jos' replies on part 1 of the review.
- Re: RIF Core, and how much is PRD allowed to diverge from BLD [Was: Re: [PRD] Issues to resolve before publication]
- Re: RIF Core, and how much is PRD allowed to diverge from BLD [Was: Re: [PRD] Issues to resolve before publication]
- Re: [SWC] comments/review SWC - part2
- Re: RIF Core, and how much is PRD allowed to diverge from BLD [Was: Re: [PRD] Issues to resolve before publication]
- RE: [PRD] Issues to resolve before publication (NAU)
- Re: RIF Core, and how much is PRD allowed to diverge from BLD [Was: Re: [PRD] Issues to resolve before publication]
- Re: [PRD] Issues to resolve before publication (NAU)
- Re: RIF Core, and how much is PRD allowed to diverge from BLD [Was: Re: [PRD] Issues to resolve before publication]
- [PRD] Further proposals to help move PRD towards FPWD
- RE: [PRD] Issues to resolve before publication (Execute)
- Re: [PRD] Issues to resolve before publication (Assign/Modify)
- Re: [PRD] Issues to resolve before publication (Execute)
- Re: [PRD] Issues to resolve before publication (ATOMIC as RULE)
- Re: [PRD] Issues to resolve before publication (NAU)
- Re: RIF Core, and how much is PRD allowed to diverge from BLD [Was: Re: [PRD] Issues to resolve before publication]