Re: Annotations and metadata in RIF

• From: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>
• Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:57:11 +0100
• To: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
• CC: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>, RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <479F4CD7.9070904@ilog.fr>

Dave Reynolds wrote:
> 
> [We could choose to only support metadata and move everything else of 
> semantic significance into the language - specifically imports and 
> required datasets. I'm not sure this is the right approach but we should 
> at least consider it.]

I understand that the reason why Jos wants attributes to have a special 
status lies in that:
>> Neither attributes nor metadata are reflected in the model theory.

Which makes sense to me (but we shoudl certainly consider the other 
approach as well).

Christian

Received on Tuesday, 29 January 2008 15:57:30 UTC