W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > January 2008

Re: regrets telecon on Tuesday

From: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:27:39 +0100
Message-ID: <4794B9EB.1020800@ilog.fr>
To: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
CC: RIF <public-rif-wg@w3.org>


Jos de Bruijn wrote:
> [...]  Additionally, people might get confused between frames and
> named argument uni terms [I have already seen this in our working group].
> (For those who are still confused: named argument uniterms are merely a 
> complicated way of writing terms; they have nothing to do whatsoever 
> with frames)

That's interesting... Can you be more specific, please?

I was under the impression, indeed, that some, and maybe most, people in 
the WG understood, from the discussion and examples, that named argument 
uniterms were related to frames (e.g. Harold justified them by the need 
for anonymous frames).

Can you explain in some more details why they are not? With an example, 


Received on Monday, 21 January 2008 15:28:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:07:41 UTC