Re: implementing named-argument uniterms (ISSUE-44)

If the order of arguments is fixed, then it is easy. But the order of
arguments is not fixed in BLD, and this is cumbersome.


	--michael  

> How hard is it to translate from BLD with named-argument uniterms to BLD
> without them, or to various rule languages without them?  Is this
> basically syntactic sugar, or is it pretty hard?
> 
> If it's hard, I don't think it's appropriate to include named-argument
> uniterms in BLD, as much as I happen to personally like them.
> 
> Specifically, can someone provide a translation algorithm and example?
> 
>     -- Sandro
> 
> 

Received on Wednesday, 9 January 2008 17:10:21 UTC