RE: Quick re-review of Core, with suggested Editor's Notes

Hi Leora, Thanks much. Done. Best, Harold
 
http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/index.php?title=Core&diff=6946&oldid=6
886
 


________________________________

From: public-rif-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rif-wg-request@w3.org]
On Behalf Of Leora Morgenstern
Sent: December 9, 2008 1:05 PM
To: public-rif-wg@w3.org
Subject: Quick re-review of Core, with suggested Editor's Notes



This is a quick re-review of the December 7, 2008 version of Core. 

The following editors' notes should be added, in accordance with the
discussion at the December 2, 2008 RIF telecon: 

Section 5, end of second paragraph: 

Editor's Note: A  reference to a specific section or theorem of Vianu97
will be provided in a future draft. 

End of Section 5.1: 

Editor's Note:   In a future draft, there will be further discussion on
the intuitions underlying this section's development of safety
conditions. Both positive and negative examples of various clauses in
the definition of safety will also be provided. 

----------------- 

In addition, please note the following stylistic issues which have been
introduced in the latest draft: 

"Like RIF-BLD and RIF-PRD, RIF-Core has both the "presentation" syntax
and the "XML" syntax." 

"This document assumes the familiarity with RIF-BLD and RIF-PRD." 

Omit "the" in all cases. 

"For instance, the requirement that each symbol appears in only one
context cannot be so expressed." 

Change "appears" to "appear". (That's the way the subjunctive works in
English.) 

Best regards, 
Leora