- From: Adrian Paschke <adrian.paschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 16:41:13 +0100
- To: "'RIF WG Public list'" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <01cc01c95494$683fbb70$38bf3250$@paschke@gmx.de>
Hi, In fulfillment of my action to send a proposal for the explicit statement of the inter-dialect / intra-dialect interoperability, I propose to merge the new "propose" requirement 5.2.5. with the existing general requirement 5.1.6. It is then clearly state the RIF MUST support intra-dialect interoperability and SHOULD support inter-dialect interoperability between different dialect whenever possible. Here the proposed extended text for 5.1.6 -Adrian 5.1.6 Rule language coverage Because of the great diversity of rule languages, no one interchange language is likely to be able to bridge between all. Instead, RIF provides dialects which are each targeted at a cluster of similar rule languages. Within that cluster, each feature of each rule language will have some degree of commonality with corresponding features of other rule languages in that cluster. The RIF dialect targeting a cluster must support, at a minimum, interchange of rules using all the features which are common to all the major rule languages in that cluster. That is, RIF must allow intra-dialect interoperation, i.e. interoperability between semantically similar rule languages (via interchange of RIF rules) within one dialect, and it should support inter-dialect interoperation, i.e. interoperation between dialects with maximum overlap.
Received on Tuesday, 2 December 2008 15:41:56 UTC