- From: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:27:36 +0200
- To: RIF <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <47161BD8.60106@inf.unibz.it>
[I originally forgot to include the mailing list in this e-mail, so I'm resending it] Michael, The order of introducing data types and truth values is not a very big issue, so I won't object. You missed the most important difference: >> Basic semantic structures. Given a set of datatypes DT which includes Semantic structures are defined relative to a set of datatypes, which is not fixed. >> all data types supported by RIF, a basic semantic structure, I, is a >> tuple of the form <D,IC, IV, IF, IR>, where > > As I said, it I believe that it is didactically better to define the effect > of the data types after that piece. OK, fine. however, could you change the sentence just before the two bullets which defined the semantics of data types to something like: "For every primitive datatype symsp it must hold that:" (the main thing is that the condition spells out that it is required to hold for every datatype). > >> * D, called the domain of I, is a non-empty countable set of elements, >> >> * IC is a mapping from Const to elements of D, such that for every >> symbol l^^u in Const, >> >> * if u is a datatype in DT, then IC(l^^u)=3DLu(l), >> Semantic structures and the entailment would also need to be defined >> with respect to a set of datatypes DT. > > Hold on. The above was a definition of semantic structures, so I fail to The above was the definition of "basic semantic structures". I refer here to the definition of "semantic structure", which is in the section on frames. > understand your last sentence. Did you mean truth valuation? What exactly > needs to be changed there? The thing is that in my proposal semantic structures are defined relative to a set of datatypes; so, entailment would also need to be defined relative to a set of datatypes. Best, Jos > > > --michael > > >> debruijn@inf.unibz.it >> >> Jos de Bruijn, http://www.debruijn.net/ -- debruijn@inf.unibz.it Jos de Bruijn, http://www.debruijn.net/ ---------------------------------------------- In heaven all the interesting people are missing. - Friedrich Nietzsche
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2007 14:27:57 UTC