- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:56:06 +0000
- To: Paul Vincent <pvincent@tibco.com>
- CC: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>, RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Paul Vincent wrote: > Seems like a simple enough answer: RIF is a rule interchange format, so > there is no reason why there should not be a dialect supporting SWRL > (non-NAF and non-disjunction). Assuming there is interest in > interchanging SWRL rules to/from non-SWRL rules. Here it gets more complicated: Note that SWRL is an *extension* of OWL, thus, before addressing SWRL, we need to fully solve OWL compatibility, which is also work in progress at the moment. Axel > Possibly the questioner would prefer to know: > - How does SWRL relate to BLD ? > - Is there some other dialect required for SWRL ? > - If so is there any development plans for such a dialect ? > > Paul Vincent > TIBCO | ETG/Business Rules > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-rif-wg-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-rif-wg-request@w3.org] >> On Behalf Of Christian de Sainte Marie >> Sent: 19 November 2007 12:04 >> To: RIF WG >> Subject: [Fwd: Negation and Disjunction in RIF] >> >> All, >> >> The question below was asked on the rif-public-comments mailing list. >> anyone cares to draft a reply? >> >> Christian > > -- Dr. Axel Polleres email: axel@polleres.net url: http://www.polleres.net/
Received on Monday, 19 November 2007 12:56:36 UTC