- From: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
- Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 16:34:21 -0500
- To: Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
It may be now, but it was not so a year ago. My info was outdated. I see that Racer has announced an upcoming complete version, and Pellet has become complete some 6 months ago. But my point is still valid. It took quite a few years to achieve a complete implementation after the official release of OWL. Another important point is that without the OWL specification there would probably be little incentive to go all the way and implement those less critical aspects of OWL. So, if we set the bar too low for RIF then there will be no incentive to work on complete implementations of important features (like equality) either. --michael > At the f2f several people claimed there were no complete OWL-DL reasoners. > > I am sitting with Aditya Kalyanpur who is one of the Pellet implementors and he > says that this is false. Pellet is a complete implementation of an OWL-DL > reasoner, and he believes Racer-Pro is as well. > > Perhaps I misunderstood the comment, so whoever made it please clarify. > > -Chris > > -- > Dr. Christopher A. Welty IBM Watson Research Center > +1.914.784.7055 19 Skyline Dr. > cawelty@gmail.com Hawthorne, NY 10532 > http://www.research.ibm.com/people/w/welty > >
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2007 21:34:40 UTC