- From: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 11:07:35 -0400
- To: "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: public-rif-wg@w3.org
> Sandro Hawke: > > > > > subclass Triple > > > > > property subject: TERM > > > > > property property: TERM > > > > > property value: TERM > > Michael Kifer: > > > > I think we were discussing > > > > whether to use a hilog-style representation for rdf or a frame-based. > > > > A triple representation was also mentioned, but not agreed upon. > > Sandro Hawke: > > > How is this Triple approach different from Frame-based? They seem the > > > same to me. > > Michael Kifer: > > All these approaches are "the same" at some level. The difference is the > > syntax. In this particular case, whether we introduce a special class > > or reuse the syntax for slotted formulas. > > Can you show me how each one looks in asn06? That would help me > understand the difference, I think. I am not an expert on ASN. But the difference is between ternary predicates, binary predicates, and slotted notation (i.e., a class with one attribute). We started a discussion about all three in the last day of the last f2f, but didn't reach any conclusions. --michael
Received on Friday, 11 May 2007 15:07:43 UTC