Re: 2007/rif vs 2007/01/rif

> Sandro and al.,
> 
> I jump on this discussion because more and more namespace no more use
> the date
> 
> See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2006Aug/0081.html
> 
> Here is the summary http://www.w3.org/2005/07/13-nsuri
> 
> As XBL (http://www.w3.org/ns/xbl), WSDL (http://www.w3.org/ns/wsdl),
> EARL (http://www.w3.org/ns/earl#) and so on
> 
> That's also the case for ISO DSDL
> 
> NVDL (http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/nvdl/ns/structure/1.0), etc...
> 
> Is is possible to consider this change?

The problem is only that changing to a non-dated namespace seems to me
to be a somewhat bigger change and more likely to need to actually be
discussed over some days -- and I'm hoping the publication of WD1 will
happen in a few hours.  It's an awkward situation, and I'm sorry for not
being up-to-date on the namespace process.  (Changing the namespace
between WD1 and WD2 also doesn't seem like a big deal if we want -- I'm
sure any implementations will have much bigger changes to make.)

     -- Sandro

Received on Friday, 30 March 2007 11:43:24 UTC