- From: Mark Proctor <mproctor@redhat.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 16:46:38 +0000
- To: Adrian GIURCA <giurca@tu-cottbus.de>
- CC: bry@lmu.de, W3C RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>, Said Tabet <stabet@comcast.net>
I'm just finishing up the language/dialects extension. This means that witin the DRL the predicates, return values, evals and consequences can use any pluggeable language; we will have initially implementations for MVEL and Java. I'm also just finishing off the Clips driver, showing that you can use DRL+dialects or a completely different rule engine language. We could probably work on some MVEL extensions with you for opaque and non-opaque actions. Mark Adrian GIURCA wrote: > We can do that with R2ML > <http://oxygen.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/rewerse-i1/?q=R2ML>. This is a > rule language of REWERSE <http://www.rewerse.net> Rule Markup Working > Group <http://oxygen.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/rewerse-i1/>. > Actually we translate R2ML into JBoss > <http://oxygen.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/translator/R2MLtoJBossRules/> > but a limited inverse translator will be available soon. > The limitation concerns with free Java code which is allowed by JBoss > Rules. Actually we have support just for a limited number and type of > actions. > -Adrian > > Mark Proctor wrote: >> The example rules (attached in email) for MISMO where done by me in >> the JBoss Rules format, but it should be easy for anyone to follow, >> it's simple propositional logic. I'm hoping to hear back from Said >> Tabet on a RuleML translation, as I'm going to hook up a limited >> RuleML driver for JBoss Rules for the purposes of a RuleML/Mismo >> demo, I can do the same for RIF, if someone can show me the XML that >> will work in a production rule system . I have advised them against >> using a vendor rule format, including jboss rules, and instead to use >> RuleML or Clips, both of which will eventually have a migration path >> to RIF. >> >> Mark >> Francois Bry (Bry-Haußer) wrote: > >
Received on Wednesday, 21 March 2007 16:48:38 UTC