Re: Mar 6 2007 telcon minutes

Hi Axel,

I was just the scribe - Chris was the one that made the comment of your
approache being "too fine-frained". I am not sure what he meant by that.
I do not know who else thinks so - when I wrote "some think ..." I was
paraphrasing Chris.  I'm sure he will make himself more explcit next
time (or by email).

BTW (to all) - here's the latest draft of today's minutes (a bit cleaned up).

-hak

Axel Polleres wrote:

> 
>> ChrisW: we had a nice RifRaf session - Axel's slides focused on syntax
>> ... seems to be a nice way to identify semantic features of languages
>> ... e.g. OWL dialect identification - Axel's works is a promising 1st 
>> step for RIF
>> ... but also some felt it was too fine grained
>> ... any comments/discussion on RIFRAF?
>> ... after looking at Axel's work, we decided to change all RIFRAF actions
>>
>> Action-179 dropped
>>
>> <AllenGinsberg> yes
>>
>> Action-175 continued for Apr 7 (Allen & Leora)
>>
>> Action-172 continued (Sandro)
>>
>> Any more RIFRAF issues?
> 
> 
> 
> apologies, couldn't make it today at short notice, will check the 
> actions. As mentioned during f2f, you can put an action to me to align 
> with the latest RIF core model and to continue my exercise.
> 
> I disagree somehow with the too "fine-grained" argument to my approach, 
> but we can discuss it next time. my idea was rather to let the RIF model 
> and the RIFRAF work not drift apart but iteratively refine them in 
> parallel.
> 
> axel
> 
> 


-- 
Hassan Aït-Kaci
ILOG, Inc. - Product Division R&D
tel/fax: +1 (604) 930-5603 - email: hak @ ilog . com