- From: Gary Hallmark <gary.hallmark@oracle.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 13:41:36 -0700
- To: public-rif-wg@w3.org
Axel Polleres wrote: > > If you ignore X then you loose soundness > > If you ignore X then you loose completeness > > and then allowing additional (possibly descriptive) > annotations which say for what cases you loose soundness or > completeness, respectively > > yes? > Even simpler, can't you just say if you ignore a rule or disjunct (for whatever reason) you loose completeness if you ignore a conjunct (for whatever reason) you loose soundness This would allow for fallback but not require any kind of fancy or complicated "fallback architecture". Even better, the user could say whether they prefer soundness or completeness, and the translator could, upon encountering an unsupported or unknown syntax element, prune the syntax tree a the appropriate point to preserve soundness or completeness. -- Oracle <http://www.oracle.com> Gary Hallmark | Architect | +1.503.525.8043 Oracle Server Technologies 1211 SW 5th Avenue, Suite 800 Portland, OR 97204
Received on Thursday, 28 June 2007 20:44:00 UTC