- From: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:47:44 +0000
- To: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>
- Cc: Stan Devitt <stan.devitt@gwi-ag.com>, RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Christian de Sainte Marie wrote: > > Stan Devitt wrote: > >> Some examples to consider that don't seem to have come up: >> >> 1. What if the RIF compliant application is a custom "editor" designed >> to create or publish a collection RIF rules? Surely it need not be able >> to execute them. > > Yes, this is an important use case that has been mentioned repeatedly, > but that may not be reflected explicity enough in our use cases. Is > there something that we should do about that? > > What is the impact of that case on the example of a rule containing a > SPARQL query? Doesn't handling a SPARQL query as a blackbox (that is, > from the editor point of view, as a piece of free text, I guess) work > for that case too? Yes. Though if the SPARQL query primitive were an official primitive in the dialect concerned then a user might expect the editor to understand the SPARQL syntax and not just treat it as unconstrained free text. Dave
Received on Tuesday, 9 January 2007 22:47:52 UTC