- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:16:17 -0600
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: public-rif-wg@w3.org
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 09:51 -0500, Sandro Hawke wrote: > > class Ruleset > property rule: Rule* > > class Rule > > subclass Forall > property clause : Clause > property declare : Var Why a * in Rule* but not in Clause* nor Var*? That seems inconsistent or backwards to me. Perhaps I don't understand the notation. > class Clause > > subclass Atom I look forward to an elaboration of Atom. Most of the issues I'm interested in are in there. > subclass Implies > property if: Condition > property then: Atom hmm... only one Atom in the 'then' part. That's weaker than SPARQL's CONSTRUCT, if I'm reading this correctly. That seems kinda odd. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 27 February 2007 15:16:50 UTC