- From: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:40:08 +0100
- To: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: RIF <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Dave Reynolds wrote: > > Since discussion [on meta-data] comes after the discussion on meta-model and > syntax does that mean that the default assumption is that this will not > be covered in WD1? The idea was, indeed, that we would address all these issues starting in WD2, but that we wanted to discuss them before releasing WD1 to make sure, at least, that we had the right "extension" points in WD1 (and as a safety check, as well). Of course, if we find out that there is an easy way to address some of these issues in WD1, I do not see why we would not do it. The main point is that we do not want to take any risk of delaying the publication of WD1 any further. Christian
Received on Tuesday, 13 February 2007 12:42:16 UTC