- From: Boley, Harold <Harold.Boley@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca>
- Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 17:23:42 -0500
- To: "Dave Reynolds" <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: "RIF WG" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Hi Dave and Sandro, I agree with Dave, if we want to impose this policy on ourselves: "No WDi (i>0) should have a link to its enclosing wiki system." (*) Since we cannot prevent 'external' links from a WDi, this would call for moving link-worthy information out, such as the page on wiki-tr itself, which Sandro maintains 'externally' but demos 'internally': http://burns.w3.org/cgi-bin/wiki_tr http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/wikitr_demo I found that wiki-tr is not that slow for the current Core pages, but Dave is right, it apparently cannot handle all kinds of links yet. So, yes, those links in our internal document should keep reminding us of improving RIF Compatibility. Best, Harold -------------------------- (*) I was against this policy when the UCR WD1 was about to 'forget' the many submitted ('raw') use cases, and now states, without giving a link: "Nearly fifty use cases documenting the need for a RIF were originally submitted." (http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-ucr) -----Original Message----- From: Dave Reynolds [mailto:der@hplb.hpl.hp.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 5:19 AM To: Boley, Harold Cc: RIF WG Subject: Re: [TED] My Core Actions from Today Hi Harold, > [NEW] ACTION: Harold to add placeholder sections each for OWL and RDF > compatibilty > [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/06-rif-minutes.html#action02] > > See new "RIF Compatibility" links in Table Of Contents: > > http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/Core For the working draft itself presumably the links to A4, A5 and the two Wiki discussion pages would be missed out? The sections A4 and A5 suggest particular approaches which haven't been agreed and certainly shouldn't go in the WD. The Wiki pages give a fuller outline of the issues but I thought the resolution yesterday indicates that the outlines have not yet received enough attention from the WG to go in the WD either. Having those links in our internal document to remind us seems OK but I don't know how the formatting tool will treat them. Dave
Received on Wednesday, 7 February 2007 22:23:54 UTC