- From: Paul Vincent <pvincent@tibco.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 07:54:33 -0800
- To: "Christian de Sainte Marie" <csma@ilog.fr>
- Cc: "RIF WG" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Hi Christian > > Apologies for absence for tomorrows call (and apologies for not finding > the meeting page to edit apologies in)... > > If the page does not exist, you have to create it to post you regrets... [PV>] The events link on the new RIF home page points to an old meeting list that ends in ~Oct. So where is the new meeting list? Or have I missed some important change on the new web site? [Of course, I *did* find the meeting page link on your agenda email, so maybe there is simply a new site issue in indexing the meeting pages?] > > Btw, any strong opinion re the proposed resolution? > > >>- Issue 40 (builtins and logical functions) [2] > >> * Functions or predicates only? > >> * Concrete syntax (presentation and XML)? See current proposal(s) on > >>the builtins page [3] > >> * List of builtins for BLD? > >> > >>PROPOSED: BLD builtins will at least include those being currently > >>listed on the builtins page [4] > > I know that it is about BLD and you are mostly concerned with PRD, but, > on the other, we want to keep BLD and PRD as close as possible... [PV>] OK, it will generally be better to share where possible the built-ins, I concur. It would be interesting to get feedback from implementors (of BLD) and the use cases (of which I have an action) on the value of the listed builtins. I note Jos' alternative for Axel's "&" operator is intriguingly incomplete :) > > Christian Paul Vincent TIBCO | ETG/Business Rules
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2007 15:54:53 UTC