Re: Reminder: pending discussion "membership" (pending discussion on ACTION-350) from Michael Kifer on 2007-12-07 (public-rif-wg@w3.org from December 2007)

From: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 10:07:54 -0500
To: "Paul Vincent" <pvincent@tibco.com>
Cc: "Dave Reynolds" <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "Public-Rif-Wg \(E-mail\)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <2126.1197040074@cs.sunysb.edu>

> My simple inference from this discussion that perhaps BLD should be
> BLCore (no "schema features") and BLDialect (BLCore + "schema
> features")? 

Yes, we discussed already that BLD is something like OWL Full--.
That is, it is definitely not a core. The core will be a profile of the
BLD, which we are yet to define.


	--michael

Received on Friday, 7 December 2007 15:11:52 UTC