- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:05:52 -0500
- To: Gerd Wagner <wagnerg@tu-cottbus.de>
- Cc: 'Chris Welty' <cawelty@frontiernet.net>, "'Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)'" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 21:18 +0200, Gerd Wagner wrote: [...] > > I'm also interested to study XML syntax designs that meet > > these typing requirements. If anyone has already sketched > > one, I'd appreciate a pointer. > > Please have a look at the XML Schema of our REWERSE Rule Markup > Language (R2ML) at > http://oxygen.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/rewerse-i1/?q=node/6 Interesting... lots of stuff there... I think the "EBNF abstract syntax" is the main thing I want to study; I'm having trouble finding it. Help? The first example I see starts with an incorrect namespace declaration... <r2ml:ProductionRule xmlns:ex="org.drools.examples.TroubleTicketExample" -- http://oxygen.informatik.tu-cottbus.de/rewerse-i1/?q=node/17 The value of a namespace attribute is a URI; "org.drools..." is not. Do you have any example of using URIs from RDF/OWL documents in R2ML rules? > R2ML can be viewed as an integration of UML/OCL with RDF/OWL/SWRL, > or as an extension of the Datalog-style language SWRL by adding > the concepts of property functions, user-defined functions and > datatype (or built-in) functions and by adding the concept of > n-ary association atoms. > > -Gerd -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 16 October 2006 20:06:06 UTC