- From: Leora Morgenstern <leora@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 11:25:10 -0400
- To: public-rif-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF3BDE91EA.67C2819C-ON85257203.0054983A-85257203.0054B350@us.ibm.com>
I mailed this to the rif mailing list this morning, but it doesn't seem to have arrived. ----- Forwarded by Leora Morgenstern/Watson/IBM on 10/10/2006 11:23 AM ----- ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 06:03:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Leora Morgenstern <leora@steam.Stanford.EDU> To: Frank McCabe <frankmccabe@mac.com>, Allen Ginsberg <aginsberg@imc.mitre.org>, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@urjc.es> Cc: public-rif-wg@w3.org Subject: Defining and assigning tasks for the RIFRAF Ontology Task Force Allen, Sandro, Frank, Axel, We've all volunteered for the RIFRAF Ontology Task Force. The first thing to do is to determine exactly what we've signed up for; next, we'll figure out how to assign tasks. My understanding (from Sandro) is that our mission is to formalize the work done on RIFRAF into an OWL ontology; that is, to translate the RIFRAF from text into OWL. This would entail, to start with, taking the classes of languages that are induced by the discriminators and arranging them in a taxonomy. Some initial work on this has already been done on a subset of the RIFRAF discriminators; see http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/Rulesystem_Arrangement_Framework . One suggestion: we can begin by extending this taxonomy to all other RIFRAF discriminators. We could divide up the set of discriminators, each propose an initial taxonomy for the assigned discriminator subset, and then, as a group, modify the taxonomies, and integrate them (a non-trivial task). This is just a suggestion; let's discuss how we all want to proceed. Best regards, Leora
Received on Tuesday, 10 October 2006 15:25:21 UTC