- From: Francis McCabe <frankmccabe@mac.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 18:52:12 -0700
- To: Chris Welty <cawelty@frontiernet.net>
- Cc: "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
I do not think that this goes far enough on implementability: 1. Reasonable cost of implementation for vendors 2. Ease of integration with other systems e.g., web services, service oriented architecture, databases,... 3. Low cost of deployment and management 4. Ease of training, etc. I am sure that there is much more. Particularly for customers; as opposed to vendors who, it can be argued, should know their business. Frank On Oct 3, 2006, at 5:18 PM, Chris Welty wrote: > > > Here is some additional text that I hope further clarifies the > difference between these two requirements: > > === Standard components === > RIF implementations must be able to use standard support > technologies such as XML parsers and other parser generators, and > should not require special purpose implementations when reuse is > possible. > > === Implementability === > RIF must be implementable using well understood techniques, and > should not require new research in > e.g. algorithms or semantics in order to implement translators. > > > > -- > Dr. Christopher A. Welty IBM Watson Research Center > +1.914.784.7055 19 Skyline Dr. > cawelty@frontiernet.net Hawthorne, NY 10532 > http://www.research.ibm.com/people/w/welty > > >
Received on Wednesday, 4 October 2006 01:52:27 UTC