- From: Christopher Welty <welty@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 15:28:38 -0500
- To: public-rif-wg@w3c.org
I do not consider there to be an actual proposal for ISWC collocation. The current Wiki page reads like a suggestion for someone to propose it, not an actual proposal. If there is a group that strongly supports the idea of ISWC collocation, they should provide the working group with a proposal that has some details specified. In particular, WHO will be the primary contact/host, to handle the local arrangements, including negotiating and signing contracts for the meeting space, Internet access, food, projector, insurance, etc. If there is to be a registration cost, HOW MUCH is it? HOW will the money be collected and disbursed to the service providers? WHO will do this? WHEN do we need to make a decision? Is someone willing to reserve the space required until the WG decides on the date & location? -Chris Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > [This is in response to the request for preferences.] > > I would prefer to have F2F4 colocated with ISWC 2006. > > Peter F. Patel-Schneider > > > > > -- Dr. Christopher A. Welty IBM Watson Research Center +1.914.784.7055 19 Skyline Dr. cawelty@frontiernet.net Hawthorne, NY 10532 http://www.research.ibm.com/people/w/welty -- Dr. Christopher A. Welty IBM Watson Research Center +1.914.784.7055 19 Skyline Dr. cawelty@frontiernet.net Hawthorne, NY 10532 http://www.research.ibm.com/people/w/welty
Received on Thursday, 30 March 2006 20:30:55 UTC