- From: Francois Bry <bry@ifi.lmu.de>
- Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 10:53:18 +0100
- To: public-rif-wg@w3.org
Axel Polleres wrote: > Suggested resolution: > > I think this could be nicely combined into one use case with a > coherent single story which outlines the different stages of business > rules usage: > a) contracting (static and dynamic) business rules and checking > static consistency. > b) processing and dynamic integration/update of new rules while > maintaining consistency with the plicy requirements, > For all these aspects the requirements in the end of 1.4 hold: "For > this to be viable from a business perspective it is critical that the > semantics of the rules and query exchange be completely predictable > and preferably loss-less." > +1 Francois
Received on Wednesday, 15 March 2006 09:53:29 UTC