Re: [RIF][All] UCR first working draft decision

My problem with the document as it stands is that there is nothing about
"Requirements" in it, contrary to the title and abstract.

peter


From: Chris Welty <cawelty@frontiernet.net>
Subject: [RIF][All] UCR first working draft decision
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 14:50:23 -0500

> As announced a few times already, we plan this tuesday to ask the WG for 
> a decision as to whether to release the currently frozen version of the 
> UCR document as a first public Working Draft.
> 
> There have been some requests for a formal vote, for a number of good 
> reasons, so we have decided to go along and hold a formal vote on 
> Tuesday, with a roll call of each organization and their position 
> (Agree, abstain, object) which will be recorded in the minutes.  We're 
> letting you know in advance since I indicated at the last telecon that 
> we would not do it this way.
> 
> So, each organization shoudl be prepared to have a spokesperson cast the 
> vote.  Invited experts get to vote.
> 
> As we've already said, if there are objections to any particular use 
> cases, we expect to hear before-hand by email, and we will amend the 
> issue to drop particular use cases from the first draft and move them to 
> the "under development" section.
> 
> -Chris

Received on Tuesday, 14 March 2006 16:23:11 UTC