Re: Constraints explained

Francois Bry <bry@ifi.lmu.de> wrote:
> 
> PS: I do not follow you in the non-FOL of ICs...
> 


I formally pointed out something that many people don't realize: The use of
constraints implies that the rulesets to which these constraints apply must
not have an FOL semantics.

This is significant to understand, since if we include constraints in Phase
1 then already in Phase 1 we must talk about the difference between FOL and
LP semantics.


	--michael  

Received on Monday, 13 March 2006 16:22:46 UTC