- From: Vincent, Paul D <PaulVincent@fairisaac.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 07:17:47 -0800
- To: "Francois Bry" <bry@ifi.lmu.de>
- Cc: "Ian Horrocks" <horrocks@cs.man.ac.uk>, "RIF WG" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
+1 but for different reasons: the specification of regulations and regulatory requirements is the most likely "killer app" for the (adoption of the) semantic web, IMHO. Paul Vincent Fair Isaac Blaze Advisor --- Business Rule Management OMG PRR and W3C RIF for rule standards -----Original Message----- From: public-rif-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rif-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Francois Bry Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 3:12 PM To: Francois Bry Cc: Ian Horrocks; RIF WG Subject: Re: [UCR] EU-Rent regulations Dear Chris, dear all, In my opinion, it would be a pity to consider "legal-like" regulation inspired from EU-REnt out of the scope of RIF. In fact, such "business rules" arfe likely to be among the most frequent uses of the RIF. Admitedly, the rules won't be express in natural language but in RIF. Regards, Francois
Received on Monday, 13 March 2006 15:18:14 UTC