- From: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>
- Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 15:58:38 +0100
- To: Uli Sattler <Ulrike.Sattler@manchester.ac.uk>
- CC: RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Uli Sattler wrote: > > in my understanding, for OWL, we will need (as for any other "formalism" > we might want to consider) a translator that takes some OWL and maps > it into RIF. It is, however, not the job of RIF to provide this > translator. Hear! Hear! However, it is our job (per the charter) to discuss the mapping and identify what can be mapped from OWL to RIF and what cannot: <<This document [the REC on using le RIF in combination with OWL] must clearly state which features of OWL can be mapped to (or otherwise interoperate with) Phase 1 rules and which cannot, and software using this mapping must be demonstrated during interoperability testing. The document may also discuss rule language extensions to cover the excluded OWL features.>> Christian
Received on Tuesday, 7 March 2006 14:58:39 UTC