- From: Andreas Harth <andreas.harth@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:46:46 +0000
- To: public-rif-wg@w3.org
Minutes of RIF telecon 2005-03-01 ================================= (Revised) Key Points ========== Next meeting on 10 January Please update the use cases pages if you haven't done so Please read the Zakim doc if you haven't done so yet Action items, resolutions ========================= ACTION: benjamin to start a wiki page with initial list of rule systems ACTION: chris clarify desiderata forlist of classifications ACTION: chris to propose a set of tags for different subgroups ACTION: harold to do a fine-grained classification scheme of rule systems ACTION: sandro add link about wiki usage ACTION: sandro update main web page re: meetings ACTION: sandro add link about wiki usage (continued) ACTION: sandro update main web page re: meetings (continued) ACTION: chris clarify desiderata forlist of classifications (continued) Detailed minutes ================ Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2005Dec/0179.html IRC log: http://www.w3.org/2006/01/03-rif-irc RSS Agent's Minutes: http://www.w3.org/2006/01/03-rif-minutes.html Meeting wiki page: http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/2006-01-03_Meeting Chair: Chris Welty Scribe: Andreas Harth 1. ADMIN -------- Role Call ......... Present: Sandro, ChrisW, MarkusK, Allen, PhilippeB, BillAnderson, csma, Ora_Lassila, Andreas_Harth, FrancoisBry, deepalik, JeremyCarroll, igor, AxelPolleres, msintek, Elisa_Kendall, Deborah_Nichols, DavidHirtle, josb, [NRCC], Hassan_Ait-Kaci, DaveReynolds, Mike_Dean, Jeff_Pan, Jos_De_Roo, Donald, Uli_Sattler, John_Hall, josb.a, +1.503.525.aahh, MinsuJang, Ed_Barkmeyer, Giorgos_Stamou, Said_Tabet, Benjamin_Grosof, PaulaP Regrets: Peter F. Patel-Schneider Meetings ........ Next meeting: 10 January Minutes ....... Minutes of last meeting accepted, no objections No amendments to the agenda Please read the Zakim doc if you haven't done so yet Wiki Policy ........... Discussion about RIF wiki etiquette - wiki changes should be attributed to a person (changes can be found in the changelog, different version can be referenced via URI) - parts of pages should have an ID to reference them in email messages (use [[Anchor(anchorname)]]) - how to handle discussions on the wiki (use the mailing list for discussions if appropriate) Some more suggestions, but time ran out. ACTION: sandro add link about wiki usage (continued) ACTION: sandro update main web page re: meetings (continued) 2. Liaison ---------- Other standards efforts such as SPARQL (W3C), PRR (OMG), Common Logic (ISO) have some overlap with the RIF work. Other efforts mentioned were OMG Semantics of Business Vocabulary and Business Rules (SBVR), OMG Ontology Definition Metamodel, OWL1.1 (as discussed in an informal meeting at ISWC), query languages and XQuery, RuleML, SWSL, and Semantic Web Services efforts at W3C. Informal efforts should be liaised with informally. Question will be who is volunteering to do the liaison work, if formal liaison is needed. This information will be recorded in the wiki. 3. Use Case & Requirements -------------------------- There was discussion around the proposed classification scheme for the Note. The main reason for improving the current classification scheme is to help relate use cases to requirements (e.g., http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/Multi-Dimensional_Use_Case_Classification). The editors will come up with a classification scheme and have a draft of the Note by the 17th, taking into account the possibly overlapping dimensions of the proposed schemes. Based on the draft more discussions and refinements are welcome. The editors asked all to update the use cases in the wiki to fit the new template. A notification about the change has been sent via the mailing list. 4. OWL & RDF Compatibility -------------------------- Jos and pfps added some content on the wiki pages, but more discussion is solicited. The mailing list was found to be the appropriate channel to elaborate on the topic. It was agreed that the group uses tags to denote different subgroups in email messages on the list. ACTION: chris to propose a set of tags for different subgroups 5. Classification ----------------- Approaches to classification were posted on the wiki. Chris suggested to use the mailing list for this type of discussions. Benjamin volunteered to put up an initial wiki page with the rule systems the group wants to consider. Harold volunteer to put together a fine-grained classification scheme based on the RuleML classification ACTION: harold to do a fine-grained classification scheme of rule systems ACTION: benjamin to start a wiki page with initial list of rule systems ACTION: chris clarify desiderata forlist of classifications (continued) 6. AoB ------ None
Received on Tuesday, 10 January 2006 16:44:52 UTC