public-rif-wg@w3.org from February 2006 by date

Tuesday, 28 February 2006

• Re: Notes face-to-face Cannes 28 Feb 2006 1130 - 1230 Evan K. Wallace
• Notes face-to-face Cannes 28 Feb 2006 1130 - 1230 John Hall
• scribe notes RIF F2F Feb 28 10:30-12:30 jos.deroo@agfa.com
• [UCR] Use case schedule from f2f Chris Welty
• [RIF] Preliminary Design Roadmap -- Slides Boley, Harold

Monday, 27 February 2006

• [RIF] Preliminary Design Roadmap Boley, Harold
• RE: [UCR] Coverage --> interchange vs exchange Stan Devitt
• ucr draft (generated from wiki) Sandro Hawke
• RE: [UCR] Coverage --> interchange vs exchange Vincent, Paul D
• [RIF] [UCR] Response to Straw Poll Comments on Section 2.2 Leora Morgenstern

Friday, 24 February 2006

• [RIF] [UCR] Summary of Coverage issues from the Straw Poll on UCR draft 20060215 Ed Barkmeyer
• Re: [UCR] Rich KR Use Case Ian Horrocks
• [UCR] Response to straw poll comments on Information Integration Frank McCabe
• [UCR] Response to straw poll comments on Section 2.7 Ginsberg, Allen
• Re: [RIF][Admin] Detailled agenda for F2F2, 27-28 February, Mandelieu (F) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [RIF][Admin] Detailled agenda for F2F2, 27-28 February, Mandelieu (F) Christian de Sainte Marie
• [RIF][UCR] Straw poll comments George Stoilos
• [RIF] [UCR] Major changes in Decision Support Use Case Leora Morgenstern
• [UCR] Response to straw poll comments on Section 2.4 Paula-Lavinia Patranjan
• RE: [UCR] Coverage Stoutenburg, Suzette
• Re: [RIF][Admin] Detailled agenda for F2F2, 27-28 February, Mandelieu (F) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [RIF][Admin] Detailled agenda for F2F2, 27-28 February, Mandelieu (F) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [RIF][Admin] Detailled agenda for F2F2, 27-28 February, Mandelieu (F) Christian de Sainte Marie
• Re: [RIF][Admin] Detailled agenda for F2F2, 27-28 February, Mandelieu (F) Christian de Sainte Marie
• Re: [RIF][Admin] Detailled agenda for F2F2, 27-28 February, Mandelieu (F) Christian de Sainte Marie
• Re: [RIF][Admin] Detailled agenda for F2F2, 27-28 February, Mandelieu (F) Dan Connolly
• RE: [UCR] Coverage Vincent, Paul D

Thursday, 23 February 2006

• [RIF][UCR] Straw poll comments Jeff Z. Pan
• [UCR] Coverage Nichols, Deborah L.
• Re: [RIF][UCR] Straw poll comments Christian de Sainte Marie
• [RIF][UCR] Straw poll comments Christian de Sainte Marie
• Re: [UCR] use case response Dave Reynolds
• RE: [RIF][Admin] Detailled agenda for F2F2, 27-28 February, Mandelieu (F) Boley, Harold
• Re: [UCR] comments on Section 1 of 15 Feb draft of RIF UCR Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: [UCR] comments on Section 1 of 15 Feb draft of RIF UCR Ginsberg, Allen
• Re: [UCR] comments on Section 1 of 15 Feb draft of RIF UCR Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [RIF][Admin] Detailled agenda for F2F2, 27-28 February, Mandelieu (F) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: [UCR] comments on Section 1 of 15 Feb draft of RIF UCR Ginsberg, Allen
• [UCR] comments on Section 1 of 15 Feb draft of RIF UCR Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• [RIF][Admin] Detailled agenda for F2F2, 27-28 February, Mandelieu (F) Christian de Sainte Marie
• [UCR] Use case review Igor Mozetic
• Re: comments JosDeBruijn on RIFUCR - List of Classified Requirements (with Duplicate Elimination)] Igor Mozetic
• [RIF][Admin] Minutes Telecon 21 February 2006 - revised George Stoilos
• [RIF] Wiki page for presentations at F2F2, 27Feb06 Paula-Lavinia Patranjan

Wednesday, 22 February 2006

• Re: [UCR] Rich KR Use Case Jim Hendler
• Re: [UCR] Rich KR Use Case Ian Horrocks
• Re: [UCR] use case response Jim Hendler
• [RIF][Admin] Minutes Telecon 21 February 2006 George Stoilos

Tuesday, 21 February 2006

• [UCR] Use case review comments stan.devitt@agfa.com
• Re: [UCR] use case response Dave Reynolds
• Making changes to sections of the RIF Use Cases and Requirements Document: what is the procedure? Leora Morgenstern
• Re: [UCR] Decision Support Use Case Leora Morgenstern
• Re: [Use Case] ETRI-UC1: Filling the holes of OWL ontology Jeff Z. Pan
• RE: [UCR] Coverage Ginsberg, Allen
• [RIF][UCR] Straw poll on UC: deadline extended to 23 Feb Christian de Sainte Marie
• Re: [UCR] use case response Jim Hendler
• Re: [UCR] Coverage Dave Reynolds
• Re: [UCR] use case response Jeff Z. Pan
• RE: [UCR] Coverage Vincent, Paul D
• [RIF][Admin] Zakim ID Codes Sandro Hawke
• Re: [UCR] Coverage Dave Reynolds
• RE: [UCR] Coverage Jos de Bruijn
• Re: [UCR] use case response Dave Reynolds
• comments JosDeBruijn on RIFUCR - List of Classified Requirements (with Duplicate Elimination)] Jos de Bruijn
• Re: [RIF]: Expressing Ruleset differences as Meta-information for RIF Mala Mehrotra
• [UCR] Use Case Comments Gary Hallmark
• [UCR] Decision Support Use Case Nichols, Deborah L.

Monday, 20 February 2006

• RE: Expressing Ruleset differences as Meta-information for RIF Mala Mehrotra
• RE: [UCR] Coverage Ginsberg, Allen
• RE: [UCR] Coverage Vincent, Paul D
• [RIF]: Expressing Ruleset differences as Meta-information for RIF Vincent, Paul D
• RE: [UCR] Coverage Ginsberg, Allen
• RE: Expressing Ruleset differences as Meta-information for RIF Ginsberg, Allen
• RE: [UCR] Coverage Vincent, Paul D
• Expressing Ruleset differences as Meta-information for RIF Mala Mehrotra
• [UCR] Rich KR Use Case Jim Hendler
• [UCR] use case response Jim Hendler
• RE: [UCR] Coverage Ginsberg, Allen
• [RIF][Admin] Agenda RIF Telecon 21 February 2006 Christian de Sainte Marie
• [UCR] DESIGN GOALS, Action on compiling list Ginsberg, Allen
• [UCR] Coverage Dave Reynolds
• [UCR] Strawpoll - Information Integration Dave Reynolds
• Re: [UCR] List of requirements on RIF added (1st draft) Axel Polleres
• Re: [UCR] List of requirements on RIF added (1st draft) Boley, Harold

Friday, 17 February 2006

• [RIF] Next F2F: do not forget to register (deadline SUNDAY 19 Feb)! Christian de Sainte Marie
• [RIF][Admin] Minutes Telecon 14 February 2006 Darko Anicic

Thursday, 16 February 2006

• [UCR] DESIGN GOALS Ginsberg, Allen
• Straw Poll on UCR Editor's Draft Sandro Hawke

Wednesday, 15 February 2006

• [RIF] Call for presentations at F2F2, 27Feb06 Christian de Sainte Marie
• [RIF][Admin] Draft agenda for F2F2, Cannes, 27-28 February 2006 Christian de Sainte Marie

Tuesday, 14 February 2006

• RE: slight re-org of UCR on the wiki Hirtle, David
• RE: [RIF][UCR] Publication use case Hirtle, David
• Re: [RIF][UCR] Human Oriented Business Rules Review Jeff Z. Pan
• Review of Abstract Use Case: Interchange of Human-oriented Business Rules Leora Morgenstern
• Agenda 14 Feb RIF Telecon 1600UTC Chris Welty

Monday, 13 February 2006

• Re: slight re-org of UCR on the wiki jos.deroo@agfa.com
• [RIF][UCR] Publication use case Christian de Sainte Marie
• slight re-org of UCR on the wiki Sandro Hawke
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Mala Mehrotra
• [UCR] List of requirements on RIF added (1st draft) Paula-Lavinia Patranjan
• Agenda 14 Feb RIF Telecon 1600UTC Christopher Welty
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Bijan Parsia

Sunday, 12 February 2006

• Re: SWRL- political motivated Dieter Fensel
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Bijan Parsia
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Dieter Fensel
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Igor Mozetic

Saturday, 11 February 2006

• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Bijan Parsia
• RE: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Gerd Wagner

Friday, 10 February 2006

• SWRL- political motivated Dieter Fensel
• Re: [RAF] small comment on discriminator "declarative vs. procedural" Ed Barkmeyer
• Re: [RAF] small comment on discriminator "declarative vs. procedural" Piero A. Bonatti
• RE: [RAF] small comment on discriminator "declarative vs. procedural" Vincent, Paul D
• Re: [RAF] small comment on discriminator "declarative vs. procedural" Piero A. Bonatti
• Re: [RAF] small comment on discriminator "declarative vs. procedural" Piero A. Bonatti
• RE: [RAF] small comment on discriminator "declarative vs. procedural" Vincent, Paul D
• [RAF] small comment on discriminator "declarative vs. procedural" Axel Polleres
• Re: [RIF][Usecases?] RE: I18N requirements Dave Reynolds
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Igor Mozetic
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> changing vendor rule languages Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> changing vendor rule languages Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> changing vendor rule languages Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> changing vendor rule languages Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> changing vendor rule languages Francois Bry

Thursday, 9 February 2006

• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> changing vendor rule languages jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Dieter Fensel
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> changing vendor rule languages Michael Kifer
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> changing vendor rule languages jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions Piero A. Bonatti
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> changing vendor rule languages Michael Kifer
• RE: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> changing vendor rule languages Vincent, Paul D
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> changing vendor rule languages Bijan Parsia
• RE: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions Vincent, Paul D
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> changing vendor rule languages Michael Kifer
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions Piero A. Bonatti
• RE: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> changing vendor rule languages Vincent, Paul D
• RE: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions Vincent, Paul D
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> changing vendor rule languages Piero A. Bonatti
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> changing vendor rule languages Michael Kifer
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions Ed Barkmeyer
• RE: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> changing vendor rule languages Vincent, Paul D
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Ed Barkmeyer
• RE: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> changing vendor rule languages Vincent, Paul D
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> changing vendor rule languages Piero A. Bonatti
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions Axel Polleres
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> changing vendor rule languages Michael Kifer
• RE: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> changing vendor rule languages Vincent, Paul D
• Announcement: Summer School "Reasoning Web 2006" Uta Schwertel
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions Dave Reynolds
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Dieter Fensel
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions Dieter Fensel
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Piero A. Bonatti
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions Michael Kifer
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Dave Reynolds
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions Piero A. Bonatti
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Piero A. Bonatti
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Piero A. Bonatti
• Re: [RIF][Usecases?] RE: I18N requirements Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF][Usecases?] RE: I18N requirements Jeremy Carroll
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Piero A. Bonatti
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions Dave Reynolds
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions Dieter Fensel
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Dieter Fensel
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Piero A. Bonatti
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Dave Reynolds
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Piero A. Bonatti
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Dave Reynolds
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions Piero A. Bonatti
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions Dieter Fensel
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Francois Bry

Wednesday, 8 February 2006

• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions Ed Barkmeyer
• RE: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions Vincent, Paul D
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Ed Barkmeyer
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Dieter Fensel
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Dieter Fensel
• RE: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions Dieter Fensel
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Dieter Fensel
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions Ed Barkmeyer
• RE: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Dieter Fensel
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Uli Sattler
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Ian Horrocks
• RE: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) --> disjunctive conclusions Vincent, Paul D
• RE: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Gerd Wagner
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Piero A. Bonatti
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Piero A. Bonatti
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Dieter Fensel
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Dieter Fensel
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Dave Reynolds
• [RIF] [UCR]: On the Notion of a "Rule Language" Ginsberg, Allen
• RE: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Gerd Wagner
• RE: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited): subset of all rule languages Vincent, Paul D
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Dieter Fensel
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Ed Barkmeyer
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Dieter Fensel
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Uli Sattler
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Dieter Fensel
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Francois Bry
• [RIF][Admin] Minutes Telecon 7 February 2006 Boley, Harold
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Bijan Parsia
• RE: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Ginsberg, Allen

Tuesday, 7 February 2006

• RE: [RIF][SWC] ACTION: JosDeBruijn create a wiki pageexplainingthe issue with bNode semantic [DONE] Vincent, Paul D
• Re: [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: [RIF][SWC] ACTION: JosDeBruijn create a wiki page explainingthe issue with bNode semantic [DONE] Jos de Bruijn
• Re: [RIF][Admin] Paul V on call today... Sandro Hawke
• RE: [RIF][SWC] ACTION: JosDeBruijn create a wiki page explainingthe issue with bNode semantic [DONE] Vincent, Paul D
• RE: [RIF][Admin] Paul V on call today... Vincent, Paul D
• [RIF] [UCR]: What is the RIF (revisited) Ginsberg, Allen
• [RIF][Use Cases] Scenario for the Portability of rules between vendor products Vincent, Paul D
• Re: [UCR] comment on reference to charter definition of "rule language" Francois Bry
• [RIF][UCR] Scenario ofr the Publication GUC Christian de Sainte Marie
• RE: [RIF][SWC] ACTION: JosDeBruijn create a wiki page explaining the issue with bNode semantic [DONE] Jos de Bruijn
• Re: [UCR] comment on reference to charter definition of "rule language" Francois Bry
• RE: [RIF][SWC] ACTION: JosDeBruijn create a wiki page explaining the issue with bNode semantic [DONE] Vincent, Paul D
• Re: [UCR] comment on reference to charter definition of "rule language" Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: [UCR] comment on reference to charter definition of "rule language" Ginsberg, Allen
• Re: [UCR] comment on reference to charter definition of "rule language" Sandro Hawke
• [UCR] comment on reference to charter definition of "rule language" Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Monday, 6 February 2006

• [RIF][SWC] ACTION: JosDeBruijn create a wiki page explaining the issue with bNode semantic [DONE] Jos de Bruijn
• [RIF][Usecases?] RE: I18N requirements Vincent, Paul D
• Agenda 7 Feb RIF Telecon 1600 UTC Chris Welty
• Re: [RIF][UCR] Human Oriented Business Rules Review Francois Bry

Sunday, 5 February 2006

• [RIF][RAF] ACTION: Explain what Lloyd Topor extensions etc mean Boley, Harold

Friday, 3 February 2006

• [RIF][UCR] Human Oriented Business Rules Review stan.devitt@agfa.com
• Re: RIF liason to Web Services Choreography? Ed Barkmeyer
• RE: RIF liason to Web Services Choreography? Vincent, Paul D
• RIF liason to Web Services Choreography? Sandro Hawke
• RE: [RIF] A Modest Proposal: Work Out Some Concrete Examples; --> complex language support Vincent, Paul D

Thursday, 2 February 2006

• RE: [RIF] A Modest Proposal: Work Out Some Concrete Examples --> Program IF Vincent, Paul D
• Re: [RIF] A Modest Proposal: Work Out Some Concrete Examples; Example-1: CHANGE-BABY-IF-WET rule Dieter Fensel
• Re: [RIF] A Modest Proposal: Work Out Some Concrete Examples; Example-1: CHANGE-BABY-IF-WET rule Francis McCabe
• Re: [RIF] A Modest Proposal: Work Out Some Concrete Examples; Example-1: CHANGE-BABY-IF-WET rule Dieter Fensel
• Re: [RIF] A Modest Proposal: Work Out Some Concrete Examples; Example-1: CHANGE-BABY-IF-WET rule Francis McCabe

Wednesday, 1 February 2006

• Re: [RIF] A Modest Proposal: Work Out Some Concrete Examples; Example-1: CHANGE-BABY-IF-WET rule Michael Kifer
• Re: [RIF] A Modest Proposal: Work Out Some Concrete Examples; Example-1: CHANGE-BABY-IF-WET rule Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [RIF] A Modest Proposal: Work Out Some Concrete Examples; Example-1: CHANGE-BABY-IF-WET rule Michael Kifer
• minutes 1-31-06 AMENDED Frank McCabe
• Re: RIF: minutes telecon 24 Jan 2006 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RIF: minutes telecon 24 Jan 2006 Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF] What is in the scope of RIF and what is not? Paula-Lavinia Patranjan
• Re: [RIF] What is in the scope of RIF and what is not? Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF] A Modest Proposal: Work Out Some Concrete Examples; Example-1: CHANGE-BABY-IF-WET rule Francois Bry

Last message date: Tuesday, 28 February 2006 19:36:12 UTC