- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@urjc.es>
- Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 00:09:09 +0200
- To: "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Dear all, In fulfillment of action item http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/actions/90 I propagated the changes made so far in the questionnaire back to the RAF page: http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/Rulesystem_Arrangement_Framework Several comments: 1) I hesitated to include Paula's new criteria in the wiki page. As the page still talks only about Phase 1, the new discriminators probably do not apply. What I could do is adding them in a new section, at the same level as === Phase 1 Expressive Discriminators === i.e., for instance: === Discriminators for Event-Condition-Action (ECA) Rules === 2) However, note then, strictly speaking also discriminators such as "Modality allowed or not (beyond FOL). Does your language have modal constructs or higher-order semantics beyond the expressivity of FOL?" do not really fall into phase 1, do they? Conclusio: We should get back to the phasing issue in RAF and clarify how to mark the discriminators therein, before we can continue adding new discriminators. 3) The discriminator "1. Test Cases" has been dropped, I think it was for some reason, as this is not really a discriminator... Just wanted to have mentioned again, that it is now dropped also from the RAF page. best, axel -- Dr. Axel Polleres email: axel@polleres.net url: http://www.polleres.net/
Received on Monday, 28 August 2006 22:10:20 UTC