- From: Chris Welty <cawelty@frontiernet.net>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 20:18:30 -0400
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>
- CC: "Vincent, Paul D" <PaulVincent@fairisaac.com>, RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Bijan Parsia wrote: >> But it is unlikely that RIF-PR will be very different from the PRR >> standard (almost by definition). > > Interesting. Sorry to be pestery, but is there much more than the W3C > stamp to add? (Which is *fine* by me. I like easy wins. Actually, I > adore easy wins!) Probably not much more. But the important thing to many rule vendors will be to ensure that the "PR extension/fragment/whatever" that corresponds to PRR is compatible with the rest of RIF. -Chris -- Dr. Christopher A. Welty IBM Watson Research Center +1.914.784.7055 19 Skyline Dr. cawelty@frontiernet.net Hawthorne, NY 10532 http://www.research.ibm.com/people/w/welty
Received on Wednesday, 26 April 2006 00:18:42 UTC