Re: [UCR] Design constraints: early example goal/csf hierarchy --> PR / PRR from Christian de Sainte Marie on 2006-04-25 (public-rif-wg@w3.org from April 2006)

From: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 16:19:51 +0200
To: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>
CC: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@isr.umd.edu>, "Vincent, Paul D" <PaulVincent@fairisaac.com>, RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>, Gerd Wagner <wagnerg@tu-cottbus.de>
Message-ID: <444E3007.1070002@ilog.fr>

Christian de Sainte Marie wrote:
> [...]
> (iii) means that RIF must provide either a standard behaviour for the 
> case when a consumer finds, in a RIF document, a feature that its 
> application cannot process, or a standard way to describe the expected 
> behaviour, or both.
> 
> I proposed a requirement to that effect [1] (actually, (ii) extends that 
> requirement).

I meant that the requirement (iii), not (ii), above extended the 
requirement I submitted on the wiki page (to non-standard RIF document).

Christian

Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2006 14:18:44 UTC