- From: Giorgos Stamou <gstam@softlab.ntua.gr>
- Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 19:15:32 +0200
- To: <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <200512061717.jB6HHq0A004097@theseas.softlab.ece.ntua.gr>
The Use Case below is an example showing the need for uncertainty representation in rules. Since uncertainty handling is not a Phase 1 or Phase 2 characteristic of the rule language but an extensibility requirement, we only give here a very short description of the idea of the Use Case. Of course there is a background work behind it that could be presented if necessary. The work has been done in collaboration of IVML-NTUA with Christine Golbreich and Ammar Mechouch (Laboratory in Medical Informatics, University of Rennes). Many thanks. Giorgos ************************************* ** Fuzzy Reasoning with Brain Anatomical Structures * Description Neuroimaging applications aim at developing new methods for assisting the labeling of the brain cortex structures in MRI (Magnetic Resonance Images). In such applications the brain cortex can be automatically segmented into various parts, but the problem remains to identify these parts. In order to enhance and assist the labeling process, knowledge of the brain anatomy has been created in the form of ontologies. Furthermore, a rule base has been created that further captures the dependencies between the relations of the brain cortex structures required [1]. Other rules are defined for validating the knowledge consistency. Unfortunately, the numerical tools that perform image segmentation and object identification attach to objects a truth-value, ranging from 0 to 1, regarding the membership degree that the image objects belong to a certain concept and the degree of asserted relations between them. * Implications: - The logical language should be capable of capturing and representing partially truth knowledge. - The reasoning engine should be capable of handling such knowledge, in order to deduce new truth-values for the membership of objects to predicates, based on the rules specified, or to validate the information automatically acquired by the numerical tools. [1] C. Golbreich, O. Bierlaire, O. Dameron, B. Gibaud, Use Case: Ontology with rules for identifying brain anatomical structures, http://www.w3.org/2004/12/rules-ws/paper/64/ ********************************************
Received on Tuesday, 6 December 2005 17:18:07 UTC