- From: Jim Melton <jim.melton@oracle.com>
- Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 12:40:22 -0600
- To: Chris Welty <cawelty@gmail.com>
- Cc: Jim Melton <jim.melton@oracle.com>,Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, "public-rif-comments@w3.org" <public-rif-comments@w3.org>, "w3c-xsl-query@w3.org" <w3c-xsl-query@w3.org>
Chris,
As you will see in my response to Sandro, my real concern is
illustrated by "values" such as "hello"^^xs:integer. If both the
is-string and is-literal-not-string functions either return false or
report a parse/syntax/something error, then I'm satisfied.
I don't recall right offhand what your isLiteral() function returns
in cases such as "hello"^^xs:integer", so I can't quickly answer
"great" or "doesn't help".
Thanks,
Jim
At 10/1/2009 06:10 PM, Chris Welty wrote:
>Jim,
>
>Regarding the naming, does this help:
>
>is-literal-not-string (x) is defined to be
>isLiteral(x) && !isString(x)
>
>Honestly I can't think of a more informative name for it.
>
>-Chris (sent from my iPhone)
========================================================================
Jim Melton --- Editor of ISO/IEC 9075-* (SQL) Phone: +1.801.942.0144
Chair, W3C XML Query WG; XQX (etc.) editor Fax : +1.801.942.3345
Oracle Corporation Oracle Email: jim dot melton at oracle dot com
1930 Viscounti Drive Standards email: jim dot melton at acm dot org
Sandy, UT 84093-1063 USA Personal email: jim at melton dot name
========================================================================
= Facts are facts. But any opinions expressed are the opinions =
= only of myself and may or may not reflect the opinions of anybody =
= else with whom I may or may not have discussed the issues at hand. =
========================================================================
Received on Friday, 2 October 2009 18:46:22 UTC