Re: Feature at risk #2 Equality in RIF-BLD

HI David,

Thanks for the comment. Note that the feature is present because of its clear 
usefulness in rules, which you note. It is *at-risk* due to its perceived 
difficulty to implement in rule engines. We await implementor feedback on that 
point.

Please acknowledge receipt of this email to <mailto:public-rif-comments@w3.org> 
(replying to this email should suffice). In your acknowledgment please let us 
know whether or not you are satisfied with the working group's response to your 
comment.


David Mott wrote:
 > I believe that the use of equality in the conclusion of a rule implication 
should
 > be retained, since there are situations where as a result of reasoning once 
wishes
 > to infer that 2 entities are in fact the same.

Received on Friday, 28 August 2009 13:30:37 UTC