- From: Robert Golan <golan@dbmind.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:11:10 -0400
- To: <public-rif-comments@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <200908250011.n7P0B9qW003839@omr4.networksolutionsemail.com>
Dear All DBmind Technologies applauds the efforts of the W3C RIF Working Group on their rule dialects created so far. One of DBmind's biggest pain points with many of the (Vertical) Industry Standards is that they tend to re-invent the wheel with their own ways of representing rules. For example, both FIXatdl and XBRL have very different ways of representing rules. A common nomenclature and taxonomy with good vocabularies have been developed with the Industry Standards DBmind works with. Many companies are implementing projects aligning with their Industry Standard vocabulary. It's unfortunate that some Industry Standards have decided not to pursue the topic of rule representation with their vocabularies due to their misunderstanding on rule dialects. Many of the companies DBmind works with look to their specific Industry Standards for not only solutions but more importantly for understanding on how rules can be implemented within their corporate information architecture. Many banks have implemented various vendor specific rules engines and do not want to be tied into a particular vendor's rule dialect. A key architecture goal for many companies is to be vendor neutral. To sum up, the W3C RIF absolutely needs to keep up their great work they have done so far so the Industry Standards like XBRL, MISMO, ACORD, FIX, FpML can all have a common understanding about rule dialects. This in turn will also aid many companies DBmind has worked with like JPmorgan, CitiBank, Chase Home Finance, Deutche Bank, Credit Suisse etc. on their usage of vocabularies and rules. Sincerely, Robert Golan Information/Rules Architect DBmind Technologies
Received on Tuesday, 25 August 2009 09:30:48 UTC