- From: <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:10:42 +0200
- To: public-rif-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF20A2829A.CAE01F3E-ONC125760F.0067FEEC-C125760F.006ED7B1@agfa.com>
A few days ago I started making an initial rif-dtb plugin for Eye http://eulersharp.sourceforge.net/README#eye plus some initial test cases at http://eulersharp.sourceforge.net/2007/07test/rifP.n3 and the actual N3 formulation of RIF builtins is following (args) func:xxx value. (args) pred:xxx true. The test result of eye --nope --plugin http://eulersharp.sourceforge.net/2006/02swap/rif-plugin.yap http://eulersharp.sourceforge.net/2007/07test/rifP.n3 --query http://eulersharp.sourceforge.net/2007/07test/rifQ.n3 is looking like #Processed by $Id: euler.yap 3080 2009-08-06 12:40:36Z josd $ @prefix func: <http://www.w3.org/2007/rif-builtin-function#>. @prefix pred: <http://www.w3.org/2007/rif-builtin-predicate#>. @prefix e: <http://eulersharp.sourceforge.net/2003/03swap/log-rules#>. @prefix : <http://eulersharp.sourceforge.net/2007/07test#>. @prefix var: <http://localhost/var#>. @prefix r: <http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/reason#>. @prefix n3: <http://www.w3.org/2004/06/rei#>. {((0 1 2) 3) func:append (0 1 2 3)} a :PASS. {((0 1 2) 3 4) func:append (0 1 2 3 4)} a :PASS. {((1 1) (1) (1) ((1))) func:append (1 1 (1) (1) ((1)))} a :PASS. {(() 1) func:append (1)} a :PASS. {(1 1) func:numeric-add 2} a :PASS. {(5 2) func:numeric-divide 2.5} a :PASS. {(5 2) func:numeric-integer-divide 2} a :PASS. {(10 3) func:numeric-mod 1} a :PASS. {(6 -2) func:numeric-mod 0} a :PASS. {(4.5 1.2) func:numeric-mod 0.9} a :PASS. {(123.0 6.0) func:numeric-mod 3.0} a :PASS. {(5 2) func:numeric-multiply 10} a :PASS. {(5 2) func:numeric-subtract 3} a :PASS. {(1 1.0) pred:numeric-equal true} a :PASS. {(1.0 0) pred:numeric-greater-than true} a :PASS. {(1.0 1) pred:numeric-greater-than-or-equal true} a :PASS. {(2.0 3) pred:numeric-less-than true} a :PASS. {(3 5.0) pred:numeric-less-than-or-equal true} a :PASS. {(1 1.01) pred:numeric-not-equal true} a :PASS. {("""abracadabra""" """bra""") pred:matches true} a :PASS. {("""abracadabra""" """^a.*a$""") pred:matches true} a :PASS. #ENDS 8 msec and we are really looking forward to Chimezie's Fuxi's RIF/XML->N3 to test RIF-BLD and later RIF-FOL (Eye uses First-order coherent logic and every FOL theory has a conservative extension that is equivalent to a Coherent Logic theory, a result that goes back to Skolem). Harold provided us a test where the extrapolated case of 30 million rules would take Eye (using Yap) 7 minutes, EyeS (using SWI-prolog) 11 years and EyeJ (using JLog) 77 years. The demand driven indexing of Yap is the best I have seen in years! Kind regards, Jos De Roo | Agfa HealthCare Senior Researcher | HE/Advanced Clinical Applications Research T +32 3444 7618 http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/ Quadrat NV, Kortrijksesteenweg 157, 9830 Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium http://www.agfa.com/healthcare
Received on Tuesday, 11 August 2009 20:11:27 UTC