[CSSWG][FXTF] CSS-wide Propdef Table Changes, Updated WDs of [css-values-4][web-animations-1][css-transitions-1][css-animations-1]

The CSS WG has published an updated Working Drafts of:

* Web Animations Level 1
   https://www.w3.org/TR/web-animations-1/
   https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/WD-web-animations-1-20181011/#changes-since-last-publication

* CSS Animations Level 1
   https://www.w3.org/TR/css-animations-1/
   Fixed issues 3119, 2797, 2666 in csswg-drafts github.

* CSS Transitions Level 1
   https://www.w3.org/TR/css-transitions-1/
   https://www.w3.org/TR/css-transitions-1/#changes

* CSS Values and Units Level 4
   https://www.w3.org/TR/css-values-4/
   Added rules for value combinations and clarified computed values.

One of the major changes was to reorganize the text describing
computed values and animation types.

   * Type-specific information about computation, interpolation,
     addition, and accumulation is now largely contained in the
     Values and Units module. See
       https://www.w3.org/TR/css-values-4/#combining-values
     and references to those terms throughout the spec. Patch at
     https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/e3b15849d0c2f0677cffaa0561f3660593ce4ea3

   * Animation type information has been removed from Transitions,
     simplified to rely on computed value types, and inserted into
     the Web Animations module:
       https://www.w3.org/TR/web-animations-1/#animating-properties

   * Likewise, the animation type tables of the CSS2+ properties
     have been condensed down to the following appendix:
       https://www.w3.org/TR/web-animations-1/#animation-types

   * The Computed Value and Animation lines in the propdef tables
     of almost all CSS modules have been updated accordingly on
     csswg.org; it may take awhile for the changes to propagate
     out to w3.org. The few remaining stragglers will be fixed in
       https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/3198

Brian Birtles also assures me that Web animations has billions of
changes and they're all interesting, so go have a look. :)

Please review the drafts, and send any comments to this mailing list,
<www-style@w3.org>, the subject prefixed with the appropriate spec
code(s) in brackets (as I did on this message) or (preferably) file
them in the GitHub repository at
   https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues

For the CSS WG,
~fantasai

Received on Friday, 12 October 2018 21:43:20 UTC