- From: Wayne Carr <wayne.carr@linux.intel.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2015 00:32:15 +0200
- To: "Dave Raggett" <dsr@w3.org>, "Dominique Hazael-Massieux" <dom@w3.org>, "Philipp Hoschka" <ph@w3.org>, "Ian Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: w3c-archive@w3.org
- Message-ID: <5519CEEF.30900@linux.intel.com>
This is a request to the Director under the Relicensing Unfinished W3C Specifications Policy [1]. * Specifications to be relicensed * The abandoned specifications we wish to relicense are from the SysApps WG [2]. The references below are to the TR (required in the relicensing policy) and the latest editor's draft (the one to relicense in the WG Note). The request is to relicense the entire last Editor's draft for each specification. 1. Contacts [3][4] 2. Messaging [5][6] 3. Telephony [7][8] * Eligibility * 1. The SysApps WG participants conducted a CfC to stop work on these specifications [11]. 2. The SysApps WG Charter [9] expired 6 months ago. There has been no attempt to recharter. The Director has not extended the Charter. Both co-Chairs have left the Working Group and no new Chair has been appointed. In our view, this Working Group has expired. There was a CfC among the participants of the WG asking that the WG be closed [10] (since it hasn't been closed by W3C in these 6 months). That is ongoing as this is being written 3. All of these specifications have reached First Public Working Draft. These specifications are not RECS and do not contain parts of previous RECs. 4. There are no plans by any Working Group to adopt these specifications. A poll in the WG in April 2014 identified these specifications as candidates to drop from the WG due to lack of implementation prospects. It was a well known issue in the WG for these particular specs and there were no suggestions to move them elsewhere. These specifications are intended for standalone applications, like native applications, and not for the usual Web security model. They are not intended for use in Web Browsers. They are in the SysApps WG specifically because they don't fit elsewhere. 5. The specifications were not abandoned due to patent concerns. They were abandoned due to the inability to attract a second implementer and lack of interest by the Working Group. * Rationale for Relicensing * Intel Corporation contributed the initial specs which we had developed for use in Tizen and Crosswalk. The specifications have now been abandoned by the SysApps WG (see below) and we want to be able to continue to work on these outside the WG. It is a risk to contribute input specifications in new areas where there may not be success. What can happen is after years of development in the Working Group, the Working Group decides they are not interested in continuing the work. In this instance, the Working Group decided not to continue the work and also it seems very unlikely that the Working Group will continue any other work. If the risk is too great that contributed work can be trapped, abandoned and unfinished in a Working Group, it will discourage work in W3C in specs that are in new areas where they may fail to maintain W3C interest. * Choice of License * We request use of the BSD 2 Clause License or an equivalent, compatible W3C license if one is available. We do not want the default W3C Software License, due to possible incompatibility with moving the content to a Community Group where it would be licensed under the W3C CLA (not the W3C Software License). * Working Group and Editor Feedback on dropping the specs and relicensing * We conducted a CfC with the participants of the SysApps WG [11]. The result was no objections to dropping the specs and no objection to relicensing them. All editors of all specifications responded to the CfC without objections. The reference [11] links to each of the responses; some were forwarded so don't have the same subject line so following one thread would not see them all. [1] http://www.w3.org/2014/12/relicense.html [2] http://www.w3.org/2012/sysapps/ [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-contacts-manager-api-20130307/ [4] http://www.w3.org/2012/sysapps/contacts-manager-api/ [5] http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-messaging-20130516/ [6] http://www.w3.org/2012/sysapps/messaging/ [7] http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-telephony-20130620/ [8] http://www.w3.org/2012/sysapps/telephony/ [9] http://www.w3.org/2012/09/sysapps-wg-charter.html [10] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sysapps/2015Mar/0009.html [11] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sysapps/2015Mar/0020.html
Attachments
- text/html attachment: stored
Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2015 14:20:29 UTC