- From: Bob Ham <rah@settrans.net>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 10:42:44 +0000
- To: <public-restrictedmedia@w3.org>
On 2014-05-16 10:17, David Singer wrote:
> staying relevant is technically a choice, like eating to
> stay alive is technically a choice.
This is an interesting statement. What you're saying is: Mozilla is
choosing to eat. In other words, they're choosing to continue as an
organisation that pursues market share in order to receive millions of
dollars from Google every year, rather than stick by their principles
and risk a lower market share and no millions of dollars.
That's fine, they're within their rights to continue pursuing their
millions of dollars and maintaining their organisation. But they can't
then pretend that the organisation has principles.
You can't give up your principles as soon as they threaten your
existence. If you do, they were never principles in the first place.
--
Bob Ham <rah@settrans.net>
for (;;) { ++pancakes; }
Received on Friday, 16 May 2014 10:43:07 UTC