Re: W3C HTML Fork without Digital Restriction Management

On 2014-01-15 12:42 Duncan Bayne wrote:
> > FWIW, the modular approach for EME was deliberate, precisely because we
> > expected that some people may choose not to implement it.
> 
> I don't think it's useful to this discussion to consider EME and CDMs
> separately.
> 
> Even if I, as a random third-party browser vendor, choose to implement
> EME that doesn't allow me to render all Open Web content.
> 
> Thus, EME breaks the Open Web.

+1

-- 
Cheers

Received on Thursday, 16 January 2014 08:40:03 UTC